75 percent of the respondents in a recent survey  conducted for Red Hat said that being able to move OpenStack workloads to different providers or platforms was important (ranked 4 or 5 out of 5)–and a mere 5 percent said that this question was of least importance. This was just one of the answers that highlighted a general desire to avoid proprietary solutions and lock-in.
For example, a minority (47 percent) said that differentiated vendor-specific management and other tooling was important while a full 75 percent said that support for complementary open source cloud management, operating system, and development tools was. With respect to management specifically, only 22 percent plan to use vendor-specific tools to manage their OpenStack environments. By contrast, a majority (51 percent) plan to use the tools built into OpenStack–in many cases complemented by open source configuration management (31 percent) and cloud management platforms (21 percent). It’s worth noting though that 42 percent of those asked about OpenStack management tools said that they were unsure/undecided, indicating that there’s still a lot of learning to go on with respect to cloud implementations in general.
This last point was reinforced by the fact that 68 percent said that the availability of training and services from the vendor to on-ramp their OpenStack project was important. (Red Hat offers a Certified System Administrator in Red Hat OpenStack certification as well as a variety of solutions to build clouds through eNovance by Red Hat.) 45 percent also cited lack of internal IT skills as a barrier to adopting OpenStack. Other aspects of commercial support were valued as well. For example, 60 percent said that hardware and software certifications are important and a full 82 percent said that production-level technical support was.
Continue reading “Survey: OpenStack users value portability, support, and complementary open source tools”
The first release of the OPNFV project, Arno, is now available. The release, named after the Italian river which flows through the city of Florence on its way to the Mediterranean Sea, is the result of significant industry collaboration, starting from the creation of the project in October 2014.
This first release establishes a strong foundation for us to work together to create a great platform for NFV. We have multiple hardware labs, running multiple deployments of OpenStack and OpenDaylight, all deployed with one-step, automated deployment tools. A set of automated tests validate that deployments are functional, and provide a framework for the addition of other tests in the future. Finally, we have a good shared understanding of the problem space, and have begun to engage with upstream projects like OpenDaylight and OpenStack to communicate requirements and propose feature additions to satisfy them.
A core value of OPNFV is “upstream first” – the idea that changes required to open source projects for NFV should happen with the communities in those projects. This is a core value for Red Hat too, and we have been happy to take a leadership role in coordinating the engagement of OPNFV members in projects like OpenDaylight and OpenStack. Red Hat engineers Tim Rozet and Dan Radez have taken a leadership role in putting together one of the two deployment options for OPNFV Arno, the Foreman/Quickstack installer, based on CentOS, RDO and OpenDaylight packages created by another Red Hat engineer, Daniel Farrell. We have been proud to play a significant part, with other members of the OPNFV community, in contributing to this important mission.
Continue reading “OPNFV Arno hits the streets”
Public vs Private, Amazon Web Services EC2 compared to OpenStack®
How to choose a cloud platform and when to use both
The public vs private cloud debate is a path well trodden. While technologies and offerings abound, there is still confusion among organizations as to which platform is suited for their agile needs. One of the key benefits to a cloud platform is the ability to spin up compute, networking and storage quickly when users request these resources and similarly decommission when no longer required. Among public cloud providers, Amazon has a market share ahead of Google, Microsoft and others. Among private cloud providers, OpenStack® presents a viable alternative to Microsoft or VMware.
This article compares Amazon Web Services EC2 and OpenStack® as follows:
- What technical features do the two platforms provide?
- How do the business characteristics of the two platforms compare?
- How do the costs compare?
- How to decide which platform to use and how to use both
OpenStack® and Amazon Web Services (AWS) EC2 defined
From OpenStack.org “OpenStack software controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, managed through a dashboard or via the OpenStack API. OpenStack works with popular enterprise and open source technologies making it ideal for heterogeneous infrastructure.”
From AWS “Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers..”
Technical comparison of OpenStack® and AWS EC2
The tables below name and briefly describe the feature in OpenStack® and AWS.
Continue reading “Public vs Private, Amazon compared to OpenStack”
The new OpenStack Kilo upstream release that became available on April 30, 2015 marks a significant milestone for the Manila project for shared file system service for OpenStack with an increase in development capacity and extensive vendors adoption. This project was kicked off 3 years ago and became incubated during 2014 and now moves to the front of the stage at the upcoming OpenStack Vancouver Conference taking place this month with customer stories of Manila deployments in Enterprise and Telco environments.
The project was originally sponsored and accelerated by NetApp and Red Hat and has established a very rich community that includes code contribution fromcompanies such as EMC, Deutsche Telekom, HP, Hitachi, Huawei, IBM, Intel, Mirantis and SUSE.
The momentum of cloud shared file services is not limited to the OpenStack open source world. In fact, last month at the AWS Summit in San Francisco, Amazon announced it new Shared File Storage for Amazon EC2, The Amazon Elastic File System also known for EFS. This new storage service is an addition to the existing AWS storage portfolio, Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) for object storage, Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) for block storage, and Amazon Glacier for archival, cold storage.
The Amazon EFS provides a standard file system semantics and is based on NFS v4 that allows the EC2 instances to access file system at the same time, providing a common data source for a wide variety of workloads and applications that are shared across thousands of instances. It is designed for broad range of use cases, such as Home directories, Content repositories, Development environments and big data applications. Data uploaded to EFS is automatically replicated to different availability zones, and because EFS file systems are SSD-based, there should be few latency and throughput related problems with the service. The Amazon EFS file system as a service allows users to create and configure file systems quickly with no minimum fee or setup cost, and customers pay only for the storage used by the file system based on elastic storage capacity that automatically grows and shrinks when adding and removing files on demand.
Continue reading “The Age of Cloud File Services”
OpenStack Kilo, the 11th release of the open source project, was officially released in April, and now is a good time to review some of the changes we saw in the OpenStack Networking (Neutron) community during this cycle, as well as some of the key new networking features introduced in the project.
Scaling the Neutron development community
The Kilo cycle brings two major efforts which are meant to better expand and scale the Neutron development community: core plugin decomposition and advanced services split. These changes should not directly impact OpenStack users but are expected to reduce code footprint, improve feature velocity, and ultimately bring faster innovation speed. Let’s take a look at each individually:
Neutron core plugin decomposition
Neutron, by design, has a pluggable architecture which offers a custom backend implementation of the Networking API. The plugin is a core piece of the deployment and acts as the “glue” between the logical API and the actual implementation. As the project evolves, more and more plugins were introduced, coming from open-source projects and communities (such as Open vSwitch and OpenDaylight), as well as from various vendors in the networking industry (like Cisco, Nuage, Midokura and others). At the beginning of the Kilo cycle, Neutron had dozens of plugins and drivers span from core plugins, ML2 mechanism drivers, L3 service plugins, and L4-L7 service plugins for FWaaS, LBaaS and VPNaaS – the majority of those included directly within the Neutron project repository. The amount of code required to review across those drivers and plugins was growing to the point where it was no longer scaling. The expectation that core Neutron reviewers review code which they had no knowledge of, or could not test due to lack of proper hardware or software setup, was not realistic. This also caused some frustration among the vendors themselves, who sometimes failed to get their plugin code merged on time.
Continue reading “What’s Coming in OpenStack Networking for the Kilo Release”
The OpenStack Kilo release, extending upon efforts that commenced during the Juno cycle, includes a number of key enhancements aimed at improving guest performance. These enhancements allow OpenStack Compute (Nova) to have greater knowledge of compute host layout and as a result make smarter scheduling and placement decisions when launching instances. Administrators wishing to take advantage of these features can now create customized performance flavors to target specialized workloads including Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and High Performance Computing (HPC).
What is NUMA topology?
Historically, all memory on x86 systems was equally accessible to all CPUs in the system. This resulted in memory access times that were the same regardless of which CPU in the system was performing the operation and was referred to as Uniform Memory Access (UMA).
In modern multi-socket x86 systems system memory is divided into zones (called cells or nodes) and associated with particular CPUs. This type of division has been key to the increasing performance of modern systems as focus has shifted from increasing clock speeds to adding more CPU sockets, cores, and – where available – threads. An interconnect bus provides connections between nodes, so that all CPUs can still access all memory. While the memory bandwidth of the interconnect is typically faster than that of an individual node it can still be overwhelmed by concurrent cross node traffic from many nodes. The end result is that while NUMA facilitates faster memory access for CPUs local to the memory being accessed, memory access for remote CPUs is slower.
Continue reading “Driving in the Fast Lane – CPU Pinning and NUMA Topology Awareness in OpenStack Compute”
In the previous blog post in this series we looked at what single root I/O virtualization (SR-IOV) networking is all about and we discussed why it is an important addition to Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform. In this second post we would like to provide a more detailed overview of the implementation, some thoughts on the current limitations, as well as what enhancements are being worked on in the OpenStack community.
Note: this post does not intend to provide a full end to end configuration guide. Customers with an active subscription are welcome to visit the official article covering SR-IOV Networking in Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 6 for a complete procedure.
Setting up the Environment
In our small test environment we used two physical nodes: one serves as a Compute node for hosting virtual machine (VM) instances, and the other serves as both the OpenStack Controller and Network node. Both nodes are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.
Continue reading “Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 6: SR-IOV Networking – Part II: Walking Through the Implementation”
As this Spring’s OpenStack Summit in Vancouver approaches, the Foundation has now posted the session agenda, outlining the final schedule of events. I am very pleased to report that Red Hat and eNovance have more than 40 approved sessions that will be included in the weeks agenda, with a few more approved as joint partner sessions, and even a few more as waiting alternates.
This vote of confidence confirms that Red Hat and eNovance continue to remain in sync with the current topics, projects, and technologies the OpenStack community and customers are most interested in and concerned with.
Red Hat is also a headline sponsor in Vancouver this Spring, along with Intel, SolidFire, and HP, and will have a dedicated keynote presentation, along with the 40+ accepted sessions. To learn more about Red Hat’s accepted sessions, have a look at the details below. Be sure to visit us at the below sessions and at our booth (#H4). We look forward to seeing you in Vancouver in May!
For more details on each session, click on the title below:
Continue reading “OpenStack Summit Vancouver: Agenda Confirms 40+ Red Hat Sessions”
In my prior post, I described how OpenStack from Red Hat frees you to pursue your business with the peace of mind that your cloud is secure and stable. Red Hat has several products that enhance OpenStack to provide cloud management, virtualization, a developer platform, and scalable cloud storage.
Cloud Management with Red Hat CloudForms
CloudForms contains three main components
- Insight – Inventory, Reporting, Metrics
- Control – Eventing, Compliance, and State Management
- Automate – Provisioning, Reconfiguration, Retirement, and Optimization
Continue reading “An ecosystem of integrated cloud products”
As your IT evolves toward an open, cloud-enabled data center, you can take advantage of OpenStack’s benefits: broad industry support, vendor neutrality, and fast-paced innovation.
As you move into implementation, your requirements for an OpenStack solutions shares a familiar theme: enterprise-ready, fully supported, and seamlessly-integrated products.
Can’t we just install and manage OpenStack ourselves?
OpenStack is an open source project and freely downloadable. To install and maintain OpenStack you need to recruit and retain engineers trained in Python and other technologies. If you decide to go it alone consider:
- How do you know OpenStack works with your hardware?
- Does OpenStack work with your guest instances?
- How do you manage and upgrade OpenStack?
- When you encounter problems, consider how you would solve them? Some examples:
Continue reading “An OpenStack Cloud that frees you to pursue your business”